tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456241.post4193849832860156316..comments2023-10-22T17:20:04.741-07:00Comments on The MoxArgon Group: InterGalactic Roundtable 2.9: Time for Time & Other Stuff...Remulak MoxArgonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05537764419568930289noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456241.post-8670964550834213562007-05-07T16:17:00.000-07:002007-05-07T16:17:00.000-07:00Remulak, Can I call you Rem? Anyway, have you see...Remulak, <BR/><BR/>Can I call you Rem? Anyway, have you seen the Al Gore documentary? (Just curious) Do you believe in global warming at all, or is it just the man-made contribution to global warming the part that sends you into a galaxy size fit of rage? Picking on Al Gore just seems kind of pathetic…but it’s funny to read nonetheless…ok…no not really. <BR/><BR/>How would a bunch of galaxy goobers like the Moron Group…oops I mean Moxargon Group know about global warming anyway. (I’m sorry I couldn’t resist)<BR/>National and international science academies and professional societies have assessed the current scientific opinion on climate change, in particular recent global warming. These assessments have largely followed or endorsed the IPCC position that "An increasing body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and other changes in the climate system... There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities". In fact the only scientific society that rejects man-made global warming is The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. I wonder who in the world funds this society? Hmmmmm…<BR/>Global Warming is real and even if you are correct in your “educated” opinion that we are not contributing in the slightest, what would be the harm in being more environmentally correct? <BR/><BR/>Thanks for the warning on Rosie. I do not think the Republican Party has anyone quite as annoyingly pathetic as Rosie…wait…wait…I can think of one…Rush Limbaugh! (Ok, Rosie may have him beat)<BR/><BR/>Condi gave a speech? Well then that obviously that means she was working feverishly on preparing this nation for a threat! (All talk and no action) C’mon Remy…may I call you Remy? I suggest you read “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror” by Richard Clarke. Richard Clarke is the former counterterrorism czar for both the Clinton and Bush Administrations. He knows a thing or two on the subject. Richard Clarke served seven presidents and worked inside the White House for George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush until he resigned in March 2003. He knows, better than anyone, the hidden successes and failures of the Clinton years. He knows, better than anyone, why we failed to prevent 9/11. He knows, better than anyone, how President Bush reacted to the attack and what happened behind the scenes in the days that followed. He knows whether or not Iraq presented a terrorist threat to the United States and whether there were hidden costs to the invasion of that country.<BR/>Most disturbing of all are Clarke's revelations about the Bush administration's lack of interest in al Qaeda prior to September 11. From the moment the Bush team took office and decided to retain Clarke in his post as the counterterrorism czar, Clarke tried to persuade them to take al Qaeda as seriously as had Bill Clinton. For months, he was denied the opportunity even to make his case to Bush. He encountered key officials who gave the impression that they had never heard of al Qaeda; who focused incessantly on Iraq; who even advocated long-discredited conspiracy theories about Saddam's involvement in previous attacks on the United States. Clarke was the nation's crisis manager on 9/11, running the Situation Room — a scene described here for the first time — and then watched in dismay at what followed. After ignoring existing plans to attack al Qaeda when he first took office, George Bush made disastrous decisions when he finally did pay attention.<BR/><BR/>I’m sure Sandy Berger was absolutely hiding something terribly incriminating for the Clinton Administration. I guess we will never know…<BR/><BR/>Had fun today…Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456241.post-72156239979324882532007-05-07T12:41:00.000-07:002007-05-07T12:41:00.000-07:00TIME to get new contributors.TIME to get off the s...TIME to get new contributors.<BR/>TIME to get off the socialist train<BR/>TIME to open mind, dump out feces<BR/>TIME...this could go on forever...Roguehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00776430153660620144noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456241.post-56361996735296498712007-05-07T12:13:00.000-07:002007-05-07T12:13:00.000-07:00In all fairness, I do not think Al has spent his e...<I>In all fairness, I do not think Al has spent his entire life studying global warming for the money.</I><BR/><BR/>No, he hasn't. That's all a load of publicist manufactured hooey.<BR/><BR/>If he was studying the environment the first half of his life would have been spent panicking about the impending <B>ICE AGE</B> that was going to bury New York under mile high glaciers by the year 2000. <BR/><BR/>Global 'Warming' didn't exist as a crisis until Margaret Thatcher pounced on the work of a lone scientist (<I>who was a pariah from the rest of the climate community</I>) as an excuse to break the coal miner's union and turn Britain onto nuclear power.<BR/><BR/>While Gore <I>may</I> have had a lifelong interest in the environment. His interest now is more on making money selling carbon indulgences that don't really mean anything. I'll believe in man-made Global Warming when Al Gore believes it, and the Martian polar ice caps stop melting and growing in the same patterns as Earth's ice caps.<BR/><BR/>And what about his power bill?<BR/><BR/>Is he running a grow op in his basement?<BR/><BR/>And don't say that it's all right because he bought 'carbon credits'. He bought them from himself, and the whole system is monitored by Al Gore and his money-making buddies.<BR/><BR/>And as for Rosie, judging by that Rasmussen poll, she's the new voice of the Democratic Party. So you better get used to her, because your fellow Democrats are going to put her back on TV as soon as possible and she's going to open that mouth as wide as she can.<BR/><BR/><I>I seem to remember a memo the Clinton Administration left for the Bush Administration as the number one threat facing this nation, and it read: “Urgent! Bin Laden planning air strikes against the U.S.” When Condi was asked why the report was ignored, she said it just wasn’t that clear. Huh?</I><BR/><BR/>Gee, and yet 6 months before she supposedly said "it wasn't that clear?" she gave a speech about the threat of Bin Laden and Al Qaida and hijackings. Yet another Hitlerian 'Big Lie' made 'true' by constant repetition.<BR/><BR/>Why don't you ask Sandy Berger for his copy of the memo?<BR/><BR/><B>Oh wait, you can't, he snuck it out of the archive stuffed in his Fruit of the Looms and chopped it up so no one else could read his notes on it. Wonder why he did that? Could he have had something to hide?</B>Remulak MoxArgonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05537764419568930289noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456241.post-73727042988748171902007-05-07T11:43:00.000-07:002007-05-07T11:43:00.000-07:00Am I wrong or did Time magazine have George Bush o...Am I wrong or did Time magazine have George Bush on their cover a year ago as the most influential person of the year? I must agree with you on this one.<BR/><BR/>Rosie is such a gift to the Republican Party. I wish she would just go away…she does not speak for most Democrats. Can Remulak beam her up and introduce her to Snotglob? <BR/><BR/>In all fairness, I do not think Al has spent his entire life studying global warming for the money. <BR/><BR/>I must say while I respect our current president GWB, I will be extremely happy when his “reign” is up and we can bring complete sentences back to the White House. <BR/><BR/>Please Fred Thompson show us what you got! The current GOP contenders are a bunch of fear- mongering dorks! <BR/><BR/>I seem to remember a memo the Clinton Administration left for the Bush Administration as the number one threat facing this nation, and it read: “Urgent! Bin Laden planning air strikes against the U.S.” When Condi was asked why the report was ignored, she said it just wasn’t that clear. Huh?<BR/><BR/>Since GWB shut down the department within the CIA that was hunting for Osama Bin Laden, then they might as well use that money for something. I’m thinking we have already given George oh… somewhere around… $400 BILLION DOLLARS for his “war on terror”<BR/><BR/>Get some sleep MoxArgon Group and try again in the morning.<BR/><BR/>(smiley face)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com