Reality Check: Arizona

I just saw the reports coming from Arizona about the mass shooting at a public appearance by Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords by a man named Jared Loughner.

I'm not going to discuss the event itself. Right now the truth is buried in a flurry of conflicting reports and it could be days before we get anywhere near the real story, if it hasn't been already lost forever in a realm of urban myth.

What I am going to talk about is the rash of talk among the political left and its supporters calling for censorship of "inflammatory rhetoric" that they believe must be behind the shooting.

Here's a reality check:

WE DON'T KNOW WHY THE REAL REASON THIS GUY SHOT THOSE PEOPLE!

He could have been inflamed by political rhetoric, he could also have been inflamed by the voices in his head.

His motives may also not spring from alleged "incitements to violence" from the political right. His real target may have been the Republican appointed Federal Judge John Roll.

The point is WE DON'T KNOW.

WE MAY NEVER REALLY KNOW.

And I want those calling for censorship and regulation of "inflammatory speech" to ask themselves these questions:

What if this guy shot a Republican politician?

What if he was screaming "I did it all for you Keith Olbermann!" as the Secret Service took him down?

Would you still be demanding that free speech, the foundation of political liberty, be tossed out the window, or would you try to pawn it off as the work of a "lone nut," or still try to find a way to blame it on Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin?

If you had an ounce of honesty in yourself, you'd answer those questions, then you'd probably tone down your own rhetoric. Because those who demand censorship usually end up censored themselves in the end.

Random Rambling Reality Checks...

Greetings puny Earthlings...

Time to cash some reality checks... let's get started...

1. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants a federal investigation to find out who is behind the funding of the opposition to the Ground Zero Islamist Victory Mosque & Handball Court. She is pretty certain that there is a sinister conspiracy of shady businessmen behind such opposition.

Why?

Because she's a Democrat, and everything they support or propose is the product of a sinister conspiracy of shady businessmen. Think health care reform, and you have a cabal of pharmaceutical and insurance companies looking to bloat themselves off the taxpayer's teat. Think Global Warming/Cap & Trade, and you have any number of schemes for everything from carbon credits to bogus 'green jobs' all needing fat government subsidies doling out cash to the already wealthy. It goes on and on.

Even the anti-war movement had financial connections to shady businessmen enriching themselves from violating the Saddam era sanctions.

When Nancy Pelosi sees someone criticizing what they support, they automatically assume that it's the product of the exact same machinations that run their own party.

So Pot, meet Kettle.

2. A common analogy in the Ground Zero Victory Mosque & International House of Falafel debate is that it's like building a Shinto Shrine honoring the Emperor Hirohito in Pearl Harbor.

Well, there's a little more to that.

It's exactly like a Shinto Shrine honoring the Emperor Hirohito built in Pearl Harbor in 1943. Remember, they may have pulled out of direct combat in Iraq, but radical Islamists are still killing, trying to kill, or plotting to kill people all over your wretched little blue-green rock as punishment for the crime of being different from them.

So, when they start crying racism and 'Islamophobia' it's another case of pot meeting kettle.

3. We at the MoxArgon Group are looking for questions. So if you need answers, then come to us and we'll cram them in your brain. So leave them in the comments.

Knees Jerking

Greetings puny Earthlings.

Sorry we've been so lazy posting lately. But it looks like we have another question, at least I think it's another question:

trent reker said...nice. we're all about superior cultures that can't spell or punctuate in the language they choose to use for their world domination scheme. are you sure you didn't get a spaceship from spacedad and take off for a weekend to see how many free drinks you could get in vegas?

And I should take lessons in Earthling grammar from someone who apparently doesn't believe in capital letters?

I could say that any grammatical errors I may have made come from Earthling English being my 6 billionth language, but those who have been with this blog since the beginning have noticed a marked improvement in the translating. So I'll just put your comment in the old circular file marked "Troll Scraps," and get down to business.

__________________

1. There's a whole lot of talk going on about the Shirley Sherrod, the rural affairs bureaucrat who had some comments from a speech sent, out of context, to internet media mogul Andrew Breitbart. Breitbart posted them, the White House went bug-shit, fired Sherrod, found out the full story, then rehired her, slandered Breitbart & Fox News for reporting the story.

Now as an intergalactic ruler, things being taken out of context by speakers happen all the time, but my minions always investigate the claims before firing anyone. It's just cheaper than all the other rigmarole, so why didn't the White House do it?

Because it was so believable.

Remember, this is the same White House that tried to get Van Jones, a self-proclaimed Marxist Truther as their "Green Jobs Czar."

The same White House whose partisan minions in the NAACP decided to forgo the real issues facing African Americans, like black on black violent crime, high rates of family disintegration, and crumbling public education systems, to brand the Tea Party movement racist.

The same White House that appointed AG Eric Holder, whose Justice Department decided that justice doesn't include stopping nut-bar racist New Black Panther Party thugs from threatening voters even after they've been convicted.

The list goes on, and on, and on. Which makes you wonder how they managed to cram in so much hypocrisy in less than two years in office. So you can understand why the Obama administration moved so quickly and clumsily to fire her without even investigating the allegations.

The cherry on top of this whole issue was when Shirley Sherrod went on TV and proved Breitbart right after all when she accused him of wanting to take America back to slavery.

_____________

2. Journolist was a by-invitation-only private e-mail thingy where liberal leaning journalists, intellectuals (I use that term loosely) and like minded semi-thinkers could share recipes for organic home-made granola cookies, bury stories about Obama and his racist Pastor, plot to destroy Sarah Palin, conspiracies to slander government critics as racist, and violent Rush Limbaugh death fantasies.

Why are people surprised?

Look at what liberal talk radio host Mike Malloy says in public:

Murdoch is a Nazi; Murdoch is a Nazi! And everyone that works for him is a potential murderer! Do you not -- do you not get that? Why does anybody in this administration pay any attention whatsoever to anything these people say? They shouldn't be listened to; they should be dragged into the street and pummeled! And I'd be very happy to be the first person to do it.

And we expect them to be any more polite when they're among their own brain-dead, morally bankrupt, fascistic kind?

Despite their claims of love of civil liberties, free speech, and other constitutional rights, the Leftist Mind is, at its core, a fascistic mind that sees the world in hard Manichean terms. They are so certain that they are correct in every way, those who may differ from them are not only wrong, they are actively evil and in the pay of some sinister force bent on world destruction.

Well as a sinister force bent on world destruction, I can tell you that I ain't paying anyone on your puny little planet.

This is the same profession that honors the recently deceased Daniel Schorr, who outlived his journalistic integrity by about 60 years. They tend to gloss over that he was a partisan hack, who deliberately fabricated a story on the CBS National News that claimed Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater was going to Germany to a secret Neo-Nazi conference to get his orders on destroying America.

The simple fact that he wasn't tarred, feathered, and run out of the profession of journalism, but instead given a cushy spot as a grey eminence suckling on the taxpayer subsidized teat of National Public Radio illustrates the state of the media today.

Journalism is dying, because journalism killed itself when it shifted from at least being open about their biases, to claiming their biases were in fact objective reality and the sum of all morality. All it cares about is getting and keeping power for its political masters, nothing more, and truth has nothing to do with it.

People want opinion presented by pundits, not reporters, and are fleeing the old media in droves because they know that they are not getting the truth, or any discussion about what might be true. They are not reporters, they are whores, and you don't get your news from whores.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: Straight From The Horse's Mouth

A SPECIAL GUEST
COMMENTARY BY
LIBBY RALL
Spokeshuman for P.O.O.P.
Progressives Organized for Organizing Progress

Hello fellow humans.

I've been given some space here on this normally racist and fascist blog to present to you normally racist and fascist alternative media readers the reasoning behind progressive thinking, or as we prefer to call it "correct" thinking.

ARIZONA: This southwestern state has officially become over 100 times worse than Nazi Germany with their racist and fascist laws oppressing our poor undocumented sisters and brothers.

Sure, all the law really does is enact pre-existing federal laws asking local police to inquire about people's immigration status when arresting them for committing crimes, but that's not the point. The point is that we need these undocumented workers more than those awful legal immigrants so we can:

1. Suppress wages at the bottom of the economic ladder. That way we can prevent the simple economics of supply and demand from decreasing poverty, and make people believe that only the government can do it.

2. Use the politics of "cultural sensitivity" to keep these undocumented people in ethnically segregated enclaves where they are unable to learn the national language and fully participate in the political system in any way that we progressives don't directly control.

3. With these undocumented people carefully isolated to protect the wonderful culture that has done so many wonderful things with Mexico, they are then completely dependent on the beneficent state to maintain them, and will thus vote to keep the correct progressive party in power when they are given the right to vote.

Now some compare the hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants to some sort of "invasion," from a third world country. Now that's just wrong, when a technologically advanced or prosperous country sends its citizens into a poor country to make over the poor country in the image of the rich country, it's imperialism. When the citizens of a poor country pour into a rich country to remake it in the image of the poor country, it's social progress in action.

That's why Arizona is evil.

The Leftist Mind: Nukes For Thee, But Not For Me

Greetings puny Earthlings.

Sorry for the light posting lately, but I've been a very lazy overlord.

But I think it's safe to dip our toe into that cesspit known as the Leftist Mind, and this time I'm going for the nuclear option.

For decades the simplest part of American foreign policy was the country's nuclear posture. It basically said that any country, or agents of said country, that attacks the USA with nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, would get the living shit nuked out of them.

This is actually a very sound policy, and one followed by American presidents for decades. Even Jimmy Carter signed off on it. But current prez Barack Obama decides that striking back at America's foreign enemies with the biggest bottle of whoop-ass Earthlings can muster is just a little too rough and tumble for him.

His new policy is that if a country attacks the USA with biological or chemical weapons, he will have his lawyers check their paperwork to see if that country is compliant with international nuclear non-proliferation treaties. If they have their no-nuke papers filed with the proper international body, then they won't have to face the ultimate sanction, and instead have to face some sort of conventional reprisal.

To translate: Imagine an American city completely depopulated with some nasty lab-created super-germ. Everyone, and I mean hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, in that city is dead, and some have become zombies thanks to this attack. The nasty super-germ was made in a lab in a country called Shitholistand.

President Obama, faced with a city of corpses, immediately dispatches his lawyers to make sure that Shitholistan hasn't been making nukes along with their super-germs. If they're declared nuke free by the United Nations, then Obama has the option of lobbing a few conventional bombs at the country, doing nothing but kill a few token civilians deliberately put in harm's way by the Grand Poobah of Shitholistan, or he can send in troops, so they can all be exposed to Shitholistan's collection of nasty viruses and bacterium.

Pres. Obama has effectively tied America's swift right hand behind its back.

Why?

Because Pres. Obama is a leftist, and here is how leftists think.

1. Leftists believe that the USA is an imperialist power that oppresses, abuses, and has actually nuked poor innocent non-Americans for no other reason than simple racism.

In short, he thinks like Tom Hanks. I'll bet dinars to donuts that Obama is convinced that Truman OK'ed the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki because he wanted to "annihilate" the "other" for daring to be ethnically different. Completely forgetting that the Japanese of the 1940s were a 100% militarized society, hardened by decades of Asian conquests, whose soldiers fought like demons and didn't whine like pussy little Al Qaida bitches that the Yankees were mean to them on the rare instances they were captured alive. And let's not forget that Japan also started the war

2. Leftists think that if you're weak, then you will be loved.

Sure, and unicorns will frolic in green fields. You see, the Leftist sees the world as a zero-sum game. America is prosperous not because of its individual liberty and industrious population. It is prosperous because it must have taken that wealth from someone else. The same goes with strength. To the leftist America cannot create strength, it has to steal it, by bullying poor innocent people like the Iranian Mullahs.

So, by their logic, if America is weak, then the oppressed will love them, and no longer attack.

WRONG!

If America is weak, then those Obama likes to call "outliers" like Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong Ill, and all the other tin-pot dictators will see it as a big fat target unwilling and unable to fight back, and they will all go for a piece.

3. The leftist doesn't believe in truth. Decades of "post-modern" intellectual nihilism has created a generation, now sitting in Washington, that thinks that there is no such thing as truth, or such "black & white" concepts like right and wrong. To them there is only opinion, and all opinion is valid, even if spat out by a delusional paranoiac hallucinating golden showers in the UN, while preparing to bring about his personal messiah by slaughtering as many people as possible.

This means that a leftist is perfectly able to decry fellow Americans as "racists," "sexists," "homophobes," and "terrorists" while completely ignoring real, and violent racist, sexist, homophobic terrorists who publicly declare their intentions and attitudes.

Those people are forgiven, or excused, because they are "oppressed" because someone from the evil imperialist West did something mean to one of their ancestors, and not because their own leadership consists of a gaggle of certifiable psychopaths.

Now I'd like to go back to the advantage of having a nuclear option.

As you know, I'm the Supreme Overlord of the Known Universe. Now that position means that a lot of little piss-pots are always trying to do something nasty to become the next alpha dog. There is one thing that keeps those piss-pots at bay.

And that is making them think you're fucking out of your fucking mind.

Making your enemies think you're crazy, and fully capable of unleashing the unspeakable upon them for looking at you cockeyed is a wonderful way of making them think twice before doing something stupid. Dictators are all the same, they'll gladly kill thousands of the innocent, but threaten to irradiate their own innards with the heat of a thousand suns, and they tend to chill out.

To do that right, you have to keep all your options open. Because someone who refuses certain ways of striking back, even when justified, is just going to get hit, again, and again.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.
by attacking Pearl Harbor.

The Leftist Mind: Pot Meet Kettle

Greetings puny Earthlings.

If all you watch is the mainstream media you'd think that America is being rocked with an unprecedented wave of threats against politicians, and that it's solely the work of angry right wing racist "tea-baggers" terrorizing innocent and pure Democrats who are only trying to make the world a utopia.

Excuse me, but I just have to call bullshit on this one.

Anyone with a brain will remember that the past decade was dominated with a wide variety of murder fantasies aimed at George W. Bush, his cabinet, his family, and anyone that sided with him on any issue. Major novels and even feature films were made about these fantasies.

Which brings us to a major dichotomy in the Leftist mind.

Threaten a conservative- You're a freedom fighter practicing your right to free expression.

Threaten a liberal- You're a domestic terrorist who is 100 times worse than Osama Bin Laden & Hitler combined, and all conservatives must now be associated with you for all time.

Now I personally think that those who make death threats against politicians aren't really working for a cause, they're just looking for an excuse to threaten someone, because that's where they really get their jollies. Those kind of people have no place in a serious discussion of a serious issue, and should be ignored by everyone but the police who should give them a good firm beating about the head with cricket bats.

Which brings me to the other part of this fiasco, and that's the mainstream media.

Let's look at the points:

1. Bart Stupak has been threatened for voting for Obamacare, but before his flip-flop he was being threatened for opposing Obamacare. Why weren't those threats reported?

2. Republican Rep. Eric Cantor, who opposes Obamacare, has had an actual gun fired at his campaign office. Why is that being ignored?

3. Despite the threats being performed by fringe dwelling troglodytes with brains and genitals comparable in size to lima beans, ALL CONSERVATIVES & CRITICS OF OBAMACARE are being branded as participating in these threats without trial, or evidence. Why is this slander allowed to go on?

Well there are two possible reasons:

1. Democrats are whiny little cry-babies.

2. Democrats & their media catamites want to lay the groundwork for some future oppression of the free speech rights of those who dare to criticize them. Why? Because the truth will only set them free from their jobs, and if they are to realize their dream of making America a government dependent one-party state, they have to quash any and all criticism.

Nothing quashes criticism better than branding critics as terrorists, whether they threaten anyone or not.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

Let Me Explain Myself

A
SPECIAL GUEST
COMMENTARY BY
REP. BART STUPAK
(D-Mich)

Hi there everyone.

It's me, Bart Stupak, the man who sold out his vote and his pro-life ideals on Obamacare in exchange for a flimsy little executive order that's not even worth the toilet paper it was written on.

Well, I guess I should explain myself, and why I flipped on the flop of Obamacare.

I'm a Democrat.

That should explain everything, but I guess it needs a little clarification.

1. Democrats obey their masters. We could have done serious tort reform, we could have opened up the market to free-competition, and we could have created inexpensive options for cheap catastrophic health insurance. But that would have helped voters, and not helped us. Our masters are the civil attorneys looking to protect their crazy lawsuits, the insurance companies looking to us for subsidies and protection of their little monopolies, radical leftists demanding the destruction of America's economy, and hedge fund speculators looking to profit from America's economic collapse.

Voters will always vote for us because the media will tell them to vote for us, and that's because deep down, the voters are sheep. So we can just ignore them, but if we day to disobey our real masters, well, then I won't get that lobbying job I need to pay to send my family to private clinics in India for health care once America's go completely to shit.

2. Democrats love power. Let me tell you something, look at every country that has nationalized health care, then look at what political party put in that nationalized medicine, and then look how they tend to dominate the elections in those countries. It's true, and while they may get voted out from time to time, they will always come back for the majority of elections.

Why? Because voters will be dependent on the state, and through the state the party that gave it to them, and fearful of giving any real power to anyone that might cancel their goodies.

So what if it's unconstitutional?

So what if it bankrupts the country for generations to come?

So what if I sold out everything I claimed to hold dear?

I'm a Democrat, which makes me the whore of power, and that's all you need to know.

The Leftist Mind: Is Glenn Beck Good For America?

Greetings puny Earthlings.

Wow, it's amazing what your Earthling mainstream media can get worked up about. Take a look at this...
You have an organisation that once employed the President of the United States caught on camera conspiring to smuggle underage girls for the purposes of sex-slavery, that same President folding like a pup tent to just about every dictator on your planet, and that's the best cover story that the editor's of the once venerable Time Magazine can come up with.

So what if Glenn Beck is a loudmouth.

So what if he says things in a dramatic, if not downright inflammatory style.

It's supposed to be a free country, and judging from the resignations, firings, and investigations his rhetoric is sparking, he's apparently saying some harsh truths that cause great discomfort to the Powers That Be who currently keep Judicial Committee Chair John Conyers' testicles in a small jar on George Soros' mantle.

I've seen Glenn Beck, he at least has facts on his side, and he doesn't go off all bug-shit crazy like MSNBC's Ed Schultz....

For those who can't interpret manic screams here's a quick translation...

"The Republicans lie! They want to see you dead! They’d rather make money off your dead corpse! They kind of like it when that woman has cancer and they don’t have anything for her."

I want to know just how do Republicans make money off of dead people who can't earn or spend money. I mean we process ours into tasty Soylent Green, but I don't think you have the technology necessary to give it that zesty flavour.

Now while Schultz is being loud and melodramatic like Beck, unlike Glenn Beck, he doesn't have any real facts behind his case, just a quick demonization of people simply because they think that the method chosen by his dear leader is not the correct way.

Beck doesn't go on telling people that Obama wants to drink the blood of their babies. He simply brings up uncomfortable facts about the President and the racists, radicals, and reprobates that surround him.

But the Leftist mind can't stand that. They only seized power through an unprecedented deception campaign, financed by shadowy figures with a bad record of wrecking economies, and then looting the assets of those countries. They believe that they are justified in their actions, because to them, it is all done in the name of "progress."

They don't want to argue with anyone that oppose them, they must crush them, because the simple act of disagreement is an evil all of its own to them.

They also assume that whoever disagrees with them must be in the pay of some sinister conspiracy.

That's called "projection."

So you get them freaking out about Glenn Beck being "angry" while their own minions demonize, promote racial divisions, sue journalists, beat up Tea Party protesters, and even bite off the occasional finger. They defend those tactics, because to them it's justified in the name of "progress."

It also makes them see nothing wrong in things like this...

Kind of has that creepy North Korea vibe, doesn't it?

Anyway, keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

I think I've got this figured out...

Greetings puny Earthlings.

I think I finally have Barack Obama figured out, and boiled it down to some pretty basic points.

1. He spurns allies like the British, the Polish, the Israelis, the Hondurans, and even the French when they're willing to fight, and he definitely doesn't give a rat's ass about their feelings.

2. He coddles enemies like Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Kim Jong-Il, and any other crackpot with a hard-on for hating America, Jews, and democracy in general, and he will kiss their ass to avoid giving them any offense, either real or imagined.

3. He is quite willing to fight dirty and be aggressive, but only toward Republicans and American voters who do not believe that the sun shines out of his back oratory.

4. He surrounds himself with racists, radicals, and reprobates, and is willing to suborn the constitution to award them with power and money.

5. He is the most obedient president in history, doing everything that he is told to do, by everyone else other than the American people.

6. He doesn't play the race card himself, because he has professional surrogates to do it for him.

7. He claims to be for freedom of speech, but is currently doing everything he can from FCC "diversity and localism" schemes to "net neutrality" to suppress it.

8. He claims to have a life defined by the audacity of hope, but his entire administration is scared of Fox News. Not very audacious. How can he stand up to Putin, Chavez, or Ahmadinejad when he's scared to the point of soiling his knickers by Glenn Beck?

What do all these little tidbits tell you?

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: Whatever Works

Greetings puny Earthlings. Time to take another dip into the snake-pit otherwise known as the LEFTIST MIND.

Today we're going to look at opportunism, big business, and stupidity.

Right now the Democrats are getting ready to go after the insurance companies, demanding information on executive salaries for them to use to pillory them. Why? It's all part of their never ending game to use class warfare to justify their own incompetence and corruption. You see the White House, the Congressional Democrats and their masters are trying to paint the civic anger over their plans for turning health care into the DMV writ large as the product of a big conspiracy run by the "eeeeeeevvvvvviiiiiiilllll" insurance companies. (All the while ignoring the obvious plant material at the Obama Greenhouse events.)

Now I'll bet dollars to Delbarian oggoorats that if you did a little digging, you would find that most of the so-called evil insurance companies, or the people that run them, donated and voted for the current ruling Democratic line-up.

Now you're probably wondering why they would do that?

Because, like their Wall Street brethren they know that deep down the Democratic Party is the party of big business.

Now you're probably thinking I've been eating Zygorthian toadstools again, but you're wrong.

You see big business loves the Democrats, because Democrats hate competition.

Democrats create regulations that prevent small players from challenging the big players, and make sure that there are plenty of loopholes in everything from the tax code to safety regs that only their rich friends can afford to exploit. Then they get to become "too big to fail" and rake in billions in bailouts from the taxpayers.

Meanwhile the small businessperson faces the fact that if they succeed too much, they will be eventually crushed by government regulations and if they have any real value they'll be bought up by one of the big boys, while the people who built the company are usually left hanging.

Now the health insurance companies backed the Democrats because they know that any free market based reform of the health insurance business would result in the opening up of the market and the elimination of the near mini-monopolies they've created across the country. Without these regulations they would have to act like real competitors, cut their prices, and maybe actually work for a living.

Of course the Democrats have turned on their former backers, because they have their own agenda, one based on state control, and will crush anything and anyone that they even perceive as either in their way, or as simply a convenient distraction.

Because when it comes to the Leftist Mind, it's all about power and control.

THE LEFTIST MIND: ASTROTURF!! ASTROTURF!!

Greetings puny Earthlings.

Time to dip our toes into that massive snake-pit called THE LEFTIST MIND.

There's a lot of anger, recriminations, and accusations over the Obamacare plan, and the Left and their media sock-puppets are screaming "CONSPIRACY!" at the top of their lungs. What's inspiring this paranoia is the seemingly spontaneous discontent among voters over the proposed destruction of the American health care system.

The Democrats are calling this an "astroturf" movement, staged by a secret cabal of millionaires, using raging mobs of allegedly professional protesters who are just too well dressed to be real Americans.

Now you're probably wondering why they're slandering voters that way, well the answer is simple.

It's called "Projection."

That's when someone accuses someone else of doing what they do all the time.

Remember, the political left is founded and funded by billionaires, has organizations like ACORN, who do nothing but run bogus protest movements, and specialize in arranging for professional protesters to harass confound and confuse the people they hate, all in the name of grassroots action.

So when a real grassroots movement starts, fueled by real outrage, the Left automatically assumes that it's just their enemies hitting them back with their own tactics. They honestly can't believe that anyone would dare disobey them without some sort of conspiracy behind it, because when it comes to everything they do, there is a conspiracy behind it.

That's all. Questions are closed at 16 or so questions, and thanks for asking, we'll be answering them over the weekend, and remember to keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: Mind and Mindset

Greetings puny Earthlings.

I'd like to toss a high-five to Harry Alford the head of the Black Chamber of Commerce for taking Sen. Barbara "Don't Call Me Ma'am" Boxer to task for her condescending behavior during recent hearing on the Waxman/Markey Crap & Raid bill.

Alford was there to discuss the study his group commissioned about the effects of the the bill on the economy. Boxer decided to leaven his testimony, which was critical of the bill, by tossing into a record a few resolutions by the NAACP about global warming.

Alford, rightfully so, got pissed and told Boxer that she was insulting him, his group, and the work they do, by tossing in unrelated resolutions. He was there to talk about economics and energy, not about how wonderful a handful of professional lobbyists think the Democrats are.

This shocked and rocked Boxer. She was used to having her ass kissed, and not kicked, and since it was being done by a black man, she was literally gobsmacked. She was expecting Alford to just shut his mouth, roll over and play the obedient servant of his political betters.

Thankfully, Alford doesn't play that way.

He stood up for himself, and refused to play the party line because he had his own mind.

And that's what stunned the already fairly stunned Boxer.

Because a Leftist like Boxer doesn't believe in individual opinions. She just assumed that as an African American, he wouldn't have his own mind, just a mindset. A mindset predetermined by narratives of victim-hood, and obedience to an ideology that claims to bring them up, while only bringing them down. Alford wasn't there to be a victim, he was there to be an individual, with his own thoughts, ideas, and beliefs, and there wasn't any way that some mindless call for racial unity was going to break that individuality.

So kudos to Harry Alford. A man with a pair of brass ones.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: Reasons & Excuses

Greetings puny Earthlings.

Time to dip our collective toes into the snake-pit of THE LEFTIST MIND!

You know a lot is talked about reasons for people to do things, but when it comes to a bulk of Leftist attitudes and platitudes, those reasons aren't the real reasons, those are just the excuses. Let's take a look at some of them...

ABORTION
THE EXCUSE: The average Leftist will tell you that it's the last absolute good in society because it gives women control over the reproductive process.

But that's just an excuse.

THE REASON: As liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said about the purpose of Roe v Wade: Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.

It's got less to do with rights, than it does with the founding principal of Planned Parenthood, Eugenics, usually through the controlled reproduction of visible minorities.

THE PEACE MOVEMENT
THE EXCUSE: They want peace in the world by limiting the aggression of American Imperialism.

THE REASON: They want dictators to take America down a peg, because they don't believe in democracy, the rule of law, or personal freedom.

HATE CRIMES
THE EXCUSE: It's wonderful to say whatever you like, as long as it does not get branded as "mean" by washed up country-rockers, or as treason by an impeached judge turned congressman, then it's straight to the concentration camp with you because you will be committing a "hate crime."

THE REASON: They don't really believe in freedom of speech, because that means they might actually have to honestly debate positions that are not backed up by facts. So they go around claiming that you can say anything, as long as it's within the approved guidelines they've set for you.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

Finally, The Truth Is Out!!!

Greetings puny Earthlings.

A caller to Al Sharpton's radio has a theory about what really happened to Michael Jackson: (h/t Radio Equalizer)

Well it makes perfect sense to me that the Governor of Alaska will have some involvement in the death of a washed up, surgically mangled, faux-Caucasian pop-singer who was so out of his gourd in his last years that he probably never heard of her, even when she ran for Vice President.

And I think that the fact that Sharpton first reaction wasn't to call her a raging paranoid lunatic tells us a lot about him too.

But I think her conspiracy theory lacks the right amount of verisimilitude. So here are some more believable ones:

1. Obama killed Michael Jackson to distract the media from the mounting failures of his administration, and that congress passed the Cap & Trade bill that will cripple the US economy.

2. CNN killed Michael Jackson to get something to hopefully attract viewers from Fox News.

3. Bubbles did it.

4. Obama didn't kill Michael Jackson, HE IS MICHAEL JACKSON. Look at the evidence, he's a very white black man, with an immense ego, bloated sense of self importance, adoring media coverage that ignore his many faults, and a tendency to rack up massive debts in very short periods of time.

That last one kinda scared me.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: I Ran From Iran

Greeting puny Earthlings, it's time for another dip into THE LEFTIST MIND.

I'd like to start by saying that a beautiful young woman named Neda Agha Soltan was recently murdered by pro-Ayatollah - Ahmadinejad goons. She is the most well known of what could, in the long run, become a list of hundreds of people murdered by Ayatollahs in their desire for the power to bring death, destruction and misery to the world.

What was President Obama's reaction to this murder, and the literally thousands of other stories of oppression and repression occuring in the Islamic Republic?

Well, he eventually uninvited them to the July 4th barbecue. Though he is still keeping the menu halal, just in case.

Meanwhile, Kim Jong-Il is threatening to lob a missile at Hawaii on July 4th, which is why he had to decline his invite to the barbecue, he hates socially awkward situations, and tells his propaganda apparatus that the dark clouds of nuclear war are gathering.

How does Obama react to these threats?

He puts the military on the alert, meanwhile slashing their anti-missile defence capabilities.

Do these decisions make sense?

No. Not a whit of sense.

So why does a man, a graduate of Columbia (though we don't know how he paid for it) and a former editor of the Harvard Law Review (though we don't know how he got that job) make these sorts of decisions that can only be described using the words "dumb" and "ass?"

Because deep down Obama is a Leftist, and the only threats that exist to leftists come from Christians, Republicans, and other people who prefer democracy to dictatorships.

Leftists do not believe in facts. They belong to the cult of post-modernism where there is no real truth, only opinions formed through the lens of race, gender, and sexual orientation.

This goes hand in hand with the belief that Western Civilization, which brought about democracy, modernity, and the foundation of equality of all under the rule of law is fundamentally evil.

Since evil can only lie, then the people that the west views as evil, must be good, and their version of truth somehow truthier than reality.

So as long as the aggressor can put some sort of claim on past victimhood, both real and imagined, they can do, or say anything, and kill anyone with wild abandon, and the Leftist won't say boo. In fact, they'll apologize for the sins of past generations, both real and imagined, in the vain hope that the killers and dictators will like them for being soft-headed nutless wimps.

Or in the case of Jimmy Carter, the leftist will actively lobby on behalf of murderers like Hamas.

And thanks to voters believing the Mainstream Media, such mushy-headedness is now official policy.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

REALITY CHECK TIME!

Greetings puny Earthlings, time for a few reality checks.

1. VOTE FRAUD FOR DUMMIES

Is Ahmadinejad really that stupid and declared himself the winner of the Iranian election mere seconds after the poll had closed?

I mean come on. When you rig an election, you have to give enough time to at least pretend to count them. Being able to maintain the pretense of democracy is one of the key skills any homicidal maniac dictator needs, especially when you're going to have actual living people run against you.

You can learn a lot from the Democrats. They can literally have armed men, dressed in the uniforms of an admitted terrorist group, standing in front of voting stations, get away with it, and the world press doesn't say boo.

2. ON DOUBLE STANDARDS

Folks are still talking about Letterman's lame, and insulting joke about the teenage child of Alaskan governor Sarah Palin. This talk has exposed a grievous set of double standards in the media, and the acolytes of Obama.

If Letterman had said a joke where the punchline was "Chelsea Clinton's a whore!" It would not only be a bad joke, the media, feminists, and the entire Democratic Party machine would fall on him like a ton of bricks. And if Letterman's defence consisted of: "I was only calling her a whore because you can't prove to me that she's still a virgin," they'd be burning gap-toothed effigies in front of CBS headquarters, and congressional committees would be called to investigate, and the IRS would suddenly develop an interest in his finances.

But instead, Letterman, blinded by his own smugness, misfired a bad joke at the wrong daughter, knowing that the bulk of the mainstream media would back him up.

The thing is, both cases, the fictional attack against Chelsea Clinton, or the all too real attack on Willow Palin, would be wrong.

They are the children of politicians, they are not politicians themselves, and don't deserved to be attacked like that.

Of course, Letterman slandering Chelsea would never happen. He knows he would be skinned alive by the very same people he sees every weekend at the Hamptons. He went after Palin, and her daughter, it doesn't matter which one, because he is essentially nutless, and assumed that since she is just a governor of Alaska and doesn't spend her weekends in the Hamptons with the rich and the powerful.

He was honestly surprised by the sincere reaction of real people, not just special interest groups, that hit him. And while his ratings may have bumped upward recently, that has more to do with gawkers watching a car wreck than looking for classic comedy.

Another thing is the general double standard the left associates to all things Palin. Take a look at this comment on the MovieLine website:

Old No. 7 said:
And we, the american public, accept Sarah's apologies for parading her pregnant unmarried daughter (with baby's father!) around the campaign trail under the guise of traditional conservative family values.

Hypocritical bitch.

Now think about this for a moment.

I would bet Skardarian sugarwads to Momgarian slimesticks that if Bristol Palin, & her Baby-daddy, didn't attend the convention, and the handful of other photo-ops and TV appearances that they did do, his comment would have been:

Old No. 7 said:
And we, the american public, accept Sarah's apologies for cruelly banishing her pregnant unmarried daughter (with baby's father!) from the campaign trail under the guise of traditional conservative family values.

Hypocritical bitch.

Because to the eyes of someone like "Old No. 7," nothing Sarah Palin does can ever be anything but evidence of some evil intent. Sure, attacking a teenage girl on national television is probably just fine by him, as long as it's done in the service of the correct political party.

Palin could cure cancer, and this fellow would join a "Save The Tumor" movement and march alongside Janeane Garofalo and probably Letterman himself, if all he had to do was smirk and pick on children.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: Everything's Political

Greetings puny Earthlings.

A lot of folks are talking about the recent White House Correspondents Dinner in Washington D.C., it was apparently quite an event with Hollywood stars flocking to bask in the glow of their messiah. That kinda nasally voiced sitcom-second banana is also getting a lot of attention for being obnoxious. I won't mention her by name, because she's an attention whoring intellectually bankrupt hypocrite and moral coward, and she wants the attention, but I will talk about the root of why she did what she did and how it relates to the leftist mind.

You see for the bulk of its history the Correspondents Dinner was a private affair. Everyone would get a little loaded, make a lot of bad jokes about each other, roast the president, the president would roast them, and while folks knew it was going on, the actual details were rarely made public. The whole purpose was for folks in an often adversarial relationship to blow off steam in a harmless manner.

I can't recall exactly when the dinner started to become more public. I think it may have started with someone trying to embarrass the Reagan administration for participating, but I was drinking a lot in the 80s, so my memory's a tad hazy. Especially of my own performance at the 1985 dinner when I welcomed "President Mondale."

But anyhoo, the event started to become public, and with the coming of the GW Bush administration it was well on the path to the complete ruin that it's in now. The press corps, about 95% Democrat, decided that blowing off steam in a friendly manner was somehow beneath them. So the dinner went from a fun evening of professionals, to yet another bitchy political platform for a sitcom second-banana hoping to get her own show by lobbing softballs at her real target, and attacking all his enemies for him in a pretty obnoxious tirade.

So you're probably wondering why they would do this to the correspondents dinner.

Well, to the Leftist Mind everything must serve their ultimate aim: Ultimate Power. There can be no relaxation, no humour, no friendly banter with rivals. There are only servants to "The Cause" and "The Evil" who oppose them. These opponents must be criticized, crucified, and ultimately criminalized. And in this battle for Ultimate Power, everything must be a weapon, and every fight must be to the death.

The headliner wasn't there to entertain, she was there to attack, and hopefully get her own sitcom out of the deal, and she did. She did her duty most obediently, compromising her own claims to believe in gay marriage, free speech, or democracy. Because the causes you claim to believe in are just window dressing when it comes to power and getting as much of it as you can.

She will be rewarded. The mainstream media will call her "brave" for attacking the powerless while giving the powerful a free pass, "original" for rehashing old material, and "brilliant" for being dull and bitter. She followed her orders, and gleefully sold them the withered remnants of her soul.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

The Leftist Mind: What Did They Know, & When Did They Know It...

Greetings puny Earthlings, time for a look into the Leftist Mind!!

Recently House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared that she had no idea water-boarding was done, even though the records show that she did, and didn't object to it. Now other than just being a Democrat, one must wonder why she lied?

Well the answer is simple.

She did it because she is a leftist, and is plotting to make America a one party state.

You see the leftist cannot accept opposition of any kind, and must crush that opposition at all costs. First they marginalize, like calling tea-party-goers "racist," deriding them as "primitive," "mentally unstable," and "ignorant." Then the marginalization goes even further with comparisons to terrorists, (Napolitano anyone?) and then wrap it all up with criminalization.

The problem is that the only thing they might use to criminalize the opposition is the so-called "torture" narrative, and they supported water-boarding, which was derived from US military training, as the lesser of two evils for a planet without telepathic data extraction technology.

Now that they're in power, they need to make it torture in order to criminalize the opposition, so they have to lie, loud and often, to hide their hand in it.

Plus it allows them to use their pets in the media to hide all the other programs that whittle down your freedoms. Remember, the Leftist only cares about their own personal power, and will use any issue, any method to get it, and keep it, while crushing all who dare question them.

Why do you think they're leaking memos about water-boarding and other interrogation techniques, but withholding the documents revealing the intelligence they uncovered?

EXCLUSIVE! NAPOLITANO'S DIRTY DOZEN!!!

The following document is the first draft of the memo released by Janet Napolitano, the Director of Homeland Security, to law enforcement agencies across the United States.

FROM THE DESK OF JANET NAPOLITANO
Director of Homeland Security

WARNING!!!

The following groups and people (in no particular order) are deemed to be threats to The Democratic Party Homeland Security.

1. US Veterans of Iraq & Afghanistan- They have been trained to kill indiscriminately and for a fascist state that lies in order to start wars to steal oil from poor innocent people like Saddam Hussein. Expect daily outbreaks of mass slaughter committed by roving bands of these heavily armed psychopaths.

2. The American Legion- This is an unabashed hate group populated by people who are actually proud of killing hundreds of thousands of Germans, Japanese, North Koreans, Chinese, and Vietnamese. Do not let their elderly appearance fool you, they are assumed to be armed, dangerous, and grouchy when you interrupt their afternoon nap.

3. The Shriners- Those little cars they drive around at parades may contain small amounts of explosives.

4. Catholics- The bizarre rituals of this cult involve eating the flesh and blood of the cult's founder. Expect outbreaks of cannibalism at any moment.

5. Libertarians- People following this twisted ideology wish to have a minimum of government involvement in their lives. Obviously the foundation of some sort of fascistic dictatorship.

6. Taxpayers- For some reason they don't want to pay more in taxes. Obviously suffer from some sort of mental deviance.

7. Orthodox Jews- They're hiding something in those beards. I just know it!

8. Wile E. Coyote- He has a seemingly endless supply of anvils, weapons, and various products made by the ACME company. Needs to have his financial records investigated.

9. Janet Napolitano- Her obsession with putting people under police surveillance for blatantly political reasons is an obvious threat to the constitution and freedom of speech.

9. Karl Rove- There has to be something we can use to lock him up. FIND IT!

10. Free Market Economists- Their ideas of personal freedom and small government threatens the development of our one party state.

11. Small Businesspeople- They don't like being singled out as "fat cats" while billionaire party backers squirm out of paying their taxes. They must be taught a lesson.

12. The State of Texas- It's up to something. I can smell it.

The Leftist Mind: The Road To Hell?

Greetings puny Earthlings, it's time once again to peek into the gaping abyss that is THE LEFTIST MIND.

Today I'm going to look at something the Leftist Mind thinks it has a complete monopoly on. I'm talking GOOD INTENTIONS.

You see, the Leftist Mind can justify anything, I mean any action, any plan, or even any crime, and can completely shrug off the often disastrous consequences because they claim to have GOOD INTENTIONS.

Start charging Veterans for treatment of injuries received in service of their country?

Yes, it's an affront to all decency, but the money saved from making them pay for their own medical care can help the government bring universal health care to everyone who hasn't been injured in the line of duty. But you can't say that it's wrong because the people doing it have GOOD INTENTIONS.

Sell out allies to empower enemies?

Sure, it can get a lot of innocent people killed, but they believe that giving in to thugs and bullies will make those bullies happy and tone down their urge to kill. So you can't call it evil because it's done with GOOD INTENTIONS.

Set up organizations to engage in widespread extortion, harassment, and voter fraud?

Yeah, it degrades democracy, but a completely free and un-corrupt democracy can lead to Republicans getting elected. Since Republicans are supposed to have a monopoly on evil, destroying democracy is all right, because doing anything to keep them out of power shows GOOD INTENTIONS.

Sell out your party to a cabal of billionaires lead by an admitted Nazi collaborator?

Why not? The billionaires oppose Republicans, that's all the evidence you need to know that they and their hidden agendas have GOOD INTENTIONS.

Plot to oppress free speech, aided and abetted by a corrupt and biased mainstream media?

It's all right, because free speech has to ability to hurt someone's feelings. Speech that brings up things like a certain President's socialist leanings, and inability to have a simple conversation without a teleprompter. In their mind dissent from a Leftist President can only lead to evil, and censoring it can only be proof of GOOD INTENTIONS.

And finally...

Scheme to extend an economic crisis?

Well, that's perfectly okay for a Leftist. What's a few ruined lives when you can use this crisis to instill a new form of government that controls people's lives from cradle to grave. Yeah, it will destroy America as the "land of opportunity" but who needs equality of opportunity when you can have equality of result under the gentle guidance of politicians. Believing that the state knows how to run individual lives better than the individual shows GOOD INTENTIONS.

I hope that makes a few things clear.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

And we don't have good intentions.