3.11.2007

The Must See Film of the Year

No I'm not talking about 300. I'm talking about The Great Global Warming Swindle. A rather shocking expose of the shoddy science and sleazy politics behind the climate change hysteria.

It's an 1 hour 16 minutes and you need to see every second to see how big this is.

And it's all Margaret Thatcher's fault.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Here is an url that you can send to friends and family that will direct them to the video "The Great Global Warming Swindle".

http://gorelied.notlong.com

For more information on the documentary you can go here.

http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html

Calvin Jones said...

It appears that the recent Channel 4 and More4 documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle" has left many viewers doubting that today's climate change is largely humanly caused. In this email, anyone so affected by the programme is urged to view the following information:

1. An introduction to the flaws of the programme. http://climatedenial.org/2007/03/09/the-great-channel-four-swindle/ (or Google "climate denial", go to 9 Mar post.)

2. How a similar docu on Channel 4 by the same director Martin Durkin in 1997 was rapped by the ITC, in particular for misleading four featured interviewees and distorting their views. See Parags. 8-11 of http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2001694,00.html

3. Prof. Carl Wunsch says: I was misled and misrepresented in the 'swindle' documentary http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2347526.ece

4. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=414 (or Google "Realclimate", go to 9 Mar post.) Climate scientists' view of some of the key flawed or discredited claims made by the programme (some of which you may have seen elsewhere). A site praised by Scientific American, with explanations for the medieval grapes, why Thames stopped freezing, and loads more.

5. http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3268874#post3268874 - with THAT graph clearly explained, plus a clear guide to the links of some of the interviewees.

6. Royal Society and science academies around the world joint statement on climate change: http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/news.asp?id=3226 (or via Google "Royal Society").

7. A blog discussion on the programme, including details of apparent breaches of the Broadcasting Code, and how to complain. http://portal.campaigncc.org/node/1820 (or Google "Climate Campaign Portal".)

Remulak MoxArgon said...

The fact that you have 7 blogs dedicated to maintaining the issue of climate change means that you have no ulterior motive in trying to discredit anything the filmmakers and all but one of the scientists interviewed have to say on the subject.

Anonymous said...

What is the most interesting are the blogs/sites listed as an attempt to censor or punish the broadcast.

Also the first site has the name 'denier' in it trying to conjure up overtones of holocaust deniers.

All of this is design to suppress scientific dissent.

Attempting to scientifically rebut the documentary is fine and how good science works. Attempting to smear, punish, and ban is how fanatical psuedo-religions or cults work. The Global Warming community is what Scientology wishes they could be.