6.30.2009

When Is A Coup Not A Coup?

Greetings puny Earthlings.

The Obama Administration has condemned the ouster and exile of Honduras' now former President Manuel Zelaya by the Honduran military, calling it a military coup.

But is it?

Let's look at the facts:

1. Manuel Zelaya was trying to subvert the country's democratic institutions in order to rewrite the constitution to keep himself in power. Plus he was doing it with the help of Hugo Chavez, the Clown Thug In Chief of Venezuela, who was apparently shipping in ballots to Zelaya to justify this exercise.

2. The Military didn't put Zelaya in front of a bullet riddled wall, with a blindfold and one last cigarette, or hung him by his heels from a lamp-post so children can use him for target practice. Instead they put him on a plane and sent him to Costa Rica. Sure, they pantsed him, but that's apparently in the constitution as part of the impeachment process.

3. The Military wasn't acting on its own. They were enforcing an order from the country's Supreme Court, and Congress. Usually military coups are just the military acting on their own.

4. The Military didn't install a junta of generals in the presidential palace, instead they passed the Presidency on to the next civilian in the line of succession, the Speaker of the Honduran Congress.

Well, it looks like something happened, but I'm doubting that it was a full fledged coup.

So why is the Obama administration so upset?

Because he felt some sympathy for Zelaya.

Look at the 3 main facts:

1. Zelaya won election by a much more narrow margin than the Mainstream Media lets on.

2. His administration was rocked by constant scandals of incompetence, corruption, and attempts to expand presidential power beyond the constitutional limits.

3. His wasted lots of time kissing Hugu Chavez's pimply ass.

Add a few trillion in debt, and they'd be twins.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

6.27.2009

Reality Checks: Michael Jackson Is Dead--

-- But people are still dying in Iran for freedom, while the American President attempts to cozy up with their killers.

-- But the House passed a "Global Warming" bill that no one has read, no one knows what it contains, or who exactly wrote it, but they do know that it will give the government unprecedented control over your life and business while crippling the economy, and doing nothing about the climate. Which is beyond the control of puny Earthlings anyway.

-- But Sonia Sotamayor's judicial record is being overlooked by the mainstream media, because her racialist and sexist beliefs will embarrass the Obama administration which shares them.

-- But American soldiers are still fighting terrorism, oppression, and evil in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Just remember that.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

6.25.2009

The Leftist Mind: I Ran From Iran

Greeting puny Earthlings, it's time for another dip into THE LEFTIST MIND.

I'd like to start by saying that a beautiful young woman named Neda Agha Soltan was recently murdered by pro-Ayatollah - Ahmadinejad goons. She is the most well known of what could, in the long run, become a list of hundreds of people murdered by Ayatollahs in their desire for the power to bring death, destruction and misery to the world.

What was President Obama's reaction to this murder, and the literally thousands of other stories of oppression and repression occuring in the Islamic Republic?

Well, he eventually uninvited them to the July 4th barbecue. Though he is still keeping the menu halal, just in case.

Meanwhile, Kim Jong-Il is threatening to lob a missile at Hawaii on July 4th, which is why he had to decline his invite to the barbecue, he hates socially awkward situations, and tells his propaganda apparatus that the dark clouds of nuclear war are gathering.

How does Obama react to these threats?

He puts the military on the alert, meanwhile slashing their anti-missile defence capabilities.

Do these decisions make sense?

No. Not a whit of sense.

So why does a man, a graduate of Columbia (though we don't know how he paid for it) and a former editor of the Harvard Law Review (though we don't know how he got that job) make these sorts of decisions that can only be described using the words "dumb" and "ass?"

Because deep down Obama is a Leftist, and the only threats that exist to leftists come from Christians, Republicans, and other people who prefer democracy to dictatorships.

Leftists do not believe in facts. They belong to the cult of post-modernism where there is no real truth, only opinions formed through the lens of race, gender, and sexual orientation.

This goes hand in hand with the belief that Western Civilization, which brought about democracy, modernity, and the foundation of equality of all under the rule of law is fundamentally evil.

Since evil can only lie, then the people that the west views as evil, must be good, and their version of truth somehow truthier than reality.

So as long as the aggressor can put some sort of claim on past victimhood, both real and imagined, they can do, or say anything, and kill anyone with wild abandon, and the Leftist won't say boo. In fact, they'll apologize for the sins of past generations, both real and imagined, in the vain hope that the killers and dictators will like them for being soft-headed nutless wimps.

Or in the case of Jimmy Carter, the leftist will actively lobby on behalf of murderers like Hamas.

And thanks to voters believing the Mainstream Media, such mushy-headedness is now official policy.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

6.21.2009

XRAN XPLAINS- WALPIN GATE

Howdy Earthlings, it's time again to simplify the complicated after it's been complicated by the simple.

Today I'm going to take a look at a story that isn't getting much play in the media, even though it tells you a hell of a lot about how the current administration operates.

So let's get's started.

This is
GERALD WALPIN
he used to be
INSPECTOR GENERAL
for the
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL
& COMMUNITY SERVICE

which oversees
AMERICORPS
a government run
volunteerism
promoting thingy

This is
KEVIN JOHNSON
former NBA star turned
Community Organizer &
Mayor of Sacramento

GERALD WALPIN
Inspected the
AMERICORPS
funded programs run by
KEVIN JOHNSON
and discovered some
SHENANIGANS
involving
MONEY
& misused

VOLUNTEERS
some of them even
WASHING JOHNSON'S CAR
GERALD WALPIN
in his role of
INSPECTOR GENERAL
asked that the groups run by
KEVIN JOHNSON
be cut off from federal funds
the trouble is that he was now
MAYOR OF SACRAMENTO
& Sacramento wants lots of
FEDERAL MONEY
because the whole state of
CALIFORNIA
is
BROKE
lucky for
KEVIN JOHNSON
he's a Democrat and
good friends with another
former Community Organizer
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
so
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
fired
GERALD WALPIN
without good cause
and when people asked about it
the
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
accused Walpin of being
SENILE

Classy.

So what's the lesson here?
PRESIDENT OBAMA
was a community organizer
but so was
BOSS TWEED
and if you're an auditor of any kind and you want to investigate a FOB (Friend Of Barack) you have to remember...


I hope that clears things up for you.

6.20.2009

Testing... Testing...

Well, who knew that Joe Biden, who has the comparative brain power of a turnip, would turn into a prophet. He said that President Obama would be tested by the world's petty tyrants and terrorists, and guess what, he is.

And I don't think he's studied for these tests.

You got North Korea threatening to lob a missile at Hawaii, Obama's home state, on the 4th of July. Plus you have Ahmadinejad rigging an election so he can keep frigging up his country for another term.

And what has Obama done in response?

Well in the case of North Korea, he has ordered some ships to Hawaii, and put the defence forces there on alert, in the hopes that they might intercept the missile if it actually works.

But he seems to have forgotten something.

Which brings me to a little parable from my own experience.

In the Hoon system on the fringe of my empire is a piss-ant little planet called Valhoon. Valhoon was technologically backward, dirt poor, and had a government that couldn't organise a shag in a brothel. But they had a leader named Nudsak, who thought that he was the rightful ruler of the universe.

Nudsak started building and testing war-ships, and threatening to nuke the neighbouring planet of Yolhoon unless the Known Universe declared him the rightful ruler.

So I sent a message back. It was a simple and direct message explaining that not only will my forces intercept and crush his piss-ant little fleet, I would kill him.

Not bomb his planet, or even invade. I would kill him, Nudsak, personally, and painfully.

Because that's how you have to talk to these kinds of dictators. They don't care about their people, and won't lose a wink of sleep if they get slaughtered, they only care about themselves.

Now I'm not saying that President Obama should go to Pyongyang and personally skin Kim Jong-Il alive, and keep him alive on life support so Kim can watch Obama eat his heart, because I doubt Obama has the street fighting skills or the retractable claws for the job. But if he launches his missile, a cruise missile in the window of his presidential palace might do the trick, even if it doesn't kill him. Remember, the North Korean people are raised to view Kim Jong-Il as a near deity and his Stalinist slave state as eternal.

Reducing his palace to a smoking hole does wonders for teaching people about their own mortality.

Now let's look at Iran.

Right now the woefully unpopular Ayatollahs of Rock and Rollas are threatening their own people 6 ways from Sunday because they dare to expect elections to actually result in people getting elected.

The theocracy is on thin ice. Rumours say they don't trust their own army and Revolutionary Guard, preferring the services of their own Basij Militias, topped off with imported thugs from Hamas, and Hezbollah.

It's a lot like the communist government in Poland in the 1980s, they oppressed everyone brutally, but lacked the military loyalty needed to go full Tianneman on their own people. Reagan played it masterfully, promoting the pro-democracy Solidarity movement, while avoiding any direct armed confrontations.

What has Obama done?

Well, he said nothing for days, then he sort of, kinda, maybe, offered some sort of, kinda, maybe tentative support behind the people on the streets, but then backed off, worrying that it sort of, kinda, maybe might destabilize Iran.

A destabilized Iran is just what you want.

A stable Iran is a terrorist supporting, nuke building, neighbour threatening basket case that exports more misery than oil.

An unstable Iran, can't support terror, build nukes, threaten neighbours, or export the misery its masters seem to love so much. Suddenly Hamas and Hezbollah can't bomb innocent women and children like they used to, and their political armor starts to break up. This will take the pressure off the democracy of Israel, and the nascent democracy sprouting in Lebanon.

However, Obama is, above all things, a Democrat.

Being a Democrat means treating enemies better than friends, which means no concrete support for real democracy in Iran, or the neutering of its terrorist catamites, because Democrats are scared that some bearded weirdo in a basement in Qom isn't going to like them.

So expect an already nutless foreign policy to get much more nutless.

6.16.2009

REALITY CHECK TIME!

Greetings puny Earthlings, time for a few reality checks.

1. VOTE FRAUD FOR DUMMIES

Is Ahmadinejad really that stupid and declared himself the winner of the Iranian election mere seconds after the poll had closed?

I mean come on. When you rig an election, you have to give enough time to at least pretend to count them. Being able to maintain the pretense of democracy is one of the key skills any homicidal maniac dictator needs, especially when you're going to have actual living people run against you.

You can learn a lot from the Democrats. They can literally have armed men, dressed in the uniforms of an admitted terrorist group, standing in front of voting stations, get away with it, and the world press doesn't say boo.

2. ON DOUBLE STANDARDS

Folks are still talking about Letterman's lame, and insulting joke about the teenage child of Alaskan governor Sarah Palin. This talk has exposed a grievous set of double standards in the media, and the acolytes of Obama.

If Letterman had said a joke where the punchline was "Chelsea Clinton's a whore!" It would not only be a bad joke, the media, feminists, and the entire Democratic Party machine would fall on him like a ton of bricks. And if Letterman's defence consisted of: "I was only calling her a whore because you can't prove to me that she's still a virgin," they'd be burning gap-toothed effigies in front of CBS headquarters, and congressional committees would be called to investigate, and the IRS would suddenly develop an interest in his finances.

But instead, Letterman, blinded by his own smugness, misfired a bad joke at the wrong daughter, knowing that the bulk of the mainstream media would back him up.

The thing is, both cases, the fictional attack against Chelsea Clinton, or the all too real attack on Willow Palin, would be wrong.

They are the children of politicians, they are not politicians themselves, and don't deserved to be attacked like that.

Of course, Letterman slandering Chelsea would never happen. He knows he would be skinned alive by the very same people he sees every weekend at the Hamptons. He went after Palin, and her daughter, it doesn't matter which one, because he is essentially nutless, and assumed that since she is just a governor of Alaska and doesn't spend her weekends in the Hamptons with the rich and the powerful.

He was honestly surprised by the sincere reaction of real people, not just special interest groups, that hit him. And while his ratings may have bumped upward recently, that has more to do with gawkers watching a car wreck than looking for classic comedy.

Another thing is the general double standard the left associates to all things Palin. Take a look at this comment on the MovieLine website:

Old No. 7 said:
And we, the american public, accept Sarah's apologies for parading her pregnant unmarried daughter (with baby's father!) around the campaign trail under the guise of traditional conservative family values.

Hypocritical bitch.
Now think about this for a moment.

I would bet Skardarian sugarwads to Momgarian slimesticks that if Bristol Palin, & her Baby-daddy, didn't attend the convention, and the handful of other photo-ops and TV appearances that they did do, his comment would have been:
Old No. 7 said:
And we, the american public, accept Sarah's apologies for cruelly banishing
her pregnant unmarried daughter (with baby's father!) from the campaign trail under the guise of traditional conservative family values.

Hypocritical bitch.

Because to the eyes of someone like "Old No. 7," nothing Sarah Palin does can ever be anything but evidence of some evil intent. Sure, attacking a teenage girl on national television is probably just fine by him, as long as it's done in the service of the correct political party.

Palin could cure cancer, and this fellow would join a "Save The Tumor" movement and march alongside Janeane Garofalo and probably Letterman himself, if all he had to do was smirk and pick on children.

Keep watching the skies, because we're watching you.

6.13.2009

XRAN XPLAINS- RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS

Okay, a lot of folks in the mainstream media are calling the 88 year old walking tumor otherwise known as James Wenneker Von Brunn a "right winger," and I think this whole situation needs a little explaining if we're going to get to the truth about where Von Brunn lies in the political spectrum.

This is
JAMES VON BRUNN
a bigoted lunatic whose only positive contribution
to society, will be as fertilizer in a graveyard

He shot up
The Holocaust Memorial in Washington
MURDERING
an innocent security guard named
STEPHEN JOHNS
before being wounded himself
VON BRUNN
is being called a
RIGHT WING EXTREMIST
by the
MAINSTREAM MEDIA

But do they have their facts straight?

Well, the only way to find out is to look at what he believes, and who believes the exact same things...
VON BRUNN
thinks the Presidency is controlled by
DA JOOZ!

So does...
REV. JEREMIAH WRIGHT
President Obama's former Pastor & Mentor
is he a "right winger?"
VON BRUNN
thinks the government should
NATIONALIZE BANKING
just like...
BARNEY FRANK
architect of the collapse of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac
is Barney Frank a "right winger?"
VON BRUNN
believed that violence was justified against the United States
just like
BILL AYERS
Obama's Friend & Unrepentant Terrorist
VON BRUNN
believes
9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
just like
ROSIE O'DONNELL
is she a "right winger?"
VON BRUNN
thinks
SOCIALISM
is the future
just like
MICHAEL MOORE
is he a "right winger" too?
VON BRUNN
hates
CHRISTIANS
FOX NEWS
NEOCONS

&
THE WEEKLY STANDARD
Even going so far as to plot to attack them

Does that sound like a "conservative" or "right winger" to you?

So why does the
MAINSTREAM MEDIA
keep INCORRECTLY calling him a
CONSERVATIVE?

Because the MAINSTREAM MEDIA
are predoninantly
LEFT WINGERS
don't want to admit that

a human stain like
JAMES VON BRUNN
is one of

THEM

I hope that clears things up for you.